Landmark cases in the United States come most frequently but not exclusively from the Supreme Court of the United States. United States Courts of Appeals may also make such decisions, particularly if the Supreme Court chooses not to review the case, or adopts the holding of the court below. Although many cases from state supreme courts are significant in developing the law of that state, only a few are so revolutionary that they announce standards that many other state courts then choose to follow.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For other uses, see Landmark cases disambiguation Landmark court decisions , in present-day common law legal systems, establish precedents that determine a significant new legal principle or concept, or otherwise substantially affect the interpretation of existing law.
It may do so by: Distinguishing a new principle that refines a prior principle, thus departing from prior practice without violating the rule of stare decisis ; Establishing a "test" that is, a measurable standard that can be applied by courts in future decisions , such as the Oakes test in Canadian law or the Bolam test in English law. Sometimes, with regard to a particular provision of a written constitution, only one court decision has been made. By necessity, until further rulings are made, this ruling is the leading case.
For example, in Canada, "[t]he leading case on voting rights and electoral boundary readjustment is Carter. In fact, Carter is the only case of disputed electoral boundaries to have reached the Supreme Court. Main article: List of House of Lords cases. Further information: List of landmark court decisions in the United States. Toronto: Carswell, , p.
- NZLII Databases.
- Flash Bangs: A sparkling array of hundred-word short stories One Hundred Varieties To Amuse & Inspire?
- JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State.
Reference Re Anti-Inflation Act. Established that it is acceptable for Canadian courts to examine historical material in addition to the text of the relevant statute. Patriation Reference.
NZLII Document Collections
Constitutional conventions. Establishes that constitutional conventions are not legally binding. Quebec AG v Blaikie No 1. Established that all laws and regulations of the province of Quebec, as well as all courts and tribunals, must treat French and English with absolute equality. Constitution Act, , section 35 1 Aboriginal rights. Establishes that aboriginal rights that pre-exist the Constitution Act, cannot be infringed without justification.
Delgamuukw v British Columbia. Establishes that aboriginal treaty rights are subject to Canadian law, but not to provincial licensing systems. This contribution reviews the rules on the political activity of judges in Slovakia from onwards to contextualise the change. The constitutional systems of the Central and Eastern European region have always held an important place in comparative constitutional research projects.
In the beginning of the s, the world followed the democratic transitions and the establishment of new constitutional courts, which had no real precursors in most of the countries, with close scrutiny. Recently, the increased interest in the region is due to the constitutional backlash that constitutional courts in these countries, especially Poland and Hungary, are facing.
Preference will be given to scholarship which, in dealing with the challenges of public life and governance, combines elements from all of the above with a good dose of political theory and social science. Monographs on public law as defined above written in any language are eligible for nomination. Only books published up to two years prior to the year of the annual meeting are eligible for nomination. Repeated nominations in consecutive years are not permitted. Books nominated for the and Book Prize are not eligible.
Data Protection Choices
Nominated books must moreover be the first original edition. The Book Prize Committee is authorized to consider books that have not been nominated and that it considers particularly worthy of consideration. Please note that authors are not eligible to nominate their own books. Please note also that edited books are not eligible for consideration.
The Society especially welcomes nominations of scholarly works by female- and male-identifying scholars. Nominations must include a justification of words explaining the basis for the nomination. Addresses will be provided after nomination. E-Books or scans can substitute hardcopies with the approval of the Chair. Failure to deliver the required number of hardcopies or substitutes will lead to non-consideration of the proposal. Lo , LLB Lond.
The subsequent growth in the jurisdictions that recognize same-sex relationships or legislate for same-sex marriages has meant that same-sex couples coming to Hong Kong to live and work would present challenges to the laws and policies of Hong Kong. Student Contribution —Manisha Bhau, B.
B Student Hons. Read the rest of this entry…. No Comments. Here is a short description of the volume : Recent years have witnessed an explosion of new research on constitution making. And here, immediately below, are the contents of this new book : 1.
Does a Landmark Civil Rights Law Protect Gay and Transgender People?
Revolutions and Constitution-Making Andrew Arato 3. Constitutional Design Deferred Rosalind Dixon 9. Constitutionalism Ancient and Oriental Patricia Springborg Developments in Constitutional Courts The European Court of Human Rights held that Finnish decision to deport an Iraqi man who was killed when he arrived back in his country of origin violated arts.
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice ordered Ireland to pay pecuniary penalties for not carrying out environmental assessment in respect of a wind farm. The UK Supreme Court ruled that, before completion of a criminal proceeding, no one shall reveal or publish the names of the appellants or any information potentially leading to their identification.
Canadian Legal Research
The Supreme Court of India delayed a ruling on ban on women entering Hindu temple. The Supreme Court of Singapore heard a case challenging the constitutionality of a colonial-era law punishing male homosexual acts. Royal Mail won a court action to block planned postal strikes in the run-up to Christmas.
In Spain, the Socialist Party won the most of votes at General Election, but fell short of a majority. A Belgian court recognized the right to publish pictures of police officers performing their duties in public spaces. A resolution of the European Parliament condemned the criminalization of sex education by a Polish draft law. Goold, Liora Lazarus eds. Greenberg ed.